Prophesy Again youtube channel presents quite a bit of strong truth, mixed in with an unhealthy dose of conspiracy theory nonsense, and outright anti-inspired word rambling.

Their unconcern for developing humans is especially sad to see.

To Webmaster:

This a continuation of the Seal of God.  You can find the entire page here:  The Seal of God    http://www.theseal-ofgod.com/

"Notice the "mark" in Ezekiel 9? This is the seal of God. Now the question is, are you sighing and crying for the iniquity of God's professed people? Do you lament over your own sins? Are you humbling yourself before God and turning away from sin and clothing yourself in Christ's righteousness? This is a serious issue friend, because those who do not feel grieved over their own sins, nor mourn over the sins of others, or the abominations being committed in the church, like the worship of THE FALSE TRINITY GOD, will be left without the seal of God.

Revelation 14:1 ...'And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads.'

Now, have a real good think about this verse. Where do we get the seal and WHO'S name do we get sealed with? We are told that we are sealed with THE FATHER'S name and that we are sealed IN our foreheads. So, let us look at these two aspects. Who is the Father?

Praying to the Father, Jesus said ...John 17:3 ...'And this is eternal life, that they may know thee, THE ONLY TRUE GOD, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.'

1 Corinthians 8:6 ...'But to us there is but ONE GOD, THE FATHER, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.'

2 John 1:3 ...'Grace be with you, mercy, and peace, from GOD THE FATHER, and from the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father, in truth and love.'

So who is 'the Father', whose 'name' we receive as the seal? He is the one true God, and Father of Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour. This is why the Bible doesn't say we are sealed with Jesus' name or the 'name of the Holy Spirit'. Because the ONE TRUE GOD of the Bible is NOT this 'trinity god' or '3 in 1 god' that the majority of churches worship. The one true God is the Father of Jesus, GOD THE FATHER. I cannot stress this enough! Do we receive the seal of "God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit"? Do we receive the seal of "the Trinity"? No. We receive the seal of the ONE TRUE GOD - THE FATHER. He alone is the one true God and it is HIS name and seal we receive. And where do we receive it? IN THE FOREHEAD. Meaning we receive it IN OUR MINDS.

"Just as soon as the people of God are sealed in their foreheads--it is not any seal or mark that can be seen, but a settling into the truth, both intellectually and spiritually, so they cannot be moved--just as soon as God's people are sealed and prepared for the shaking, it will come. Indeed, it has begun already; the judgments of God are now upon the land, to give us warning, that we may know what is coming." (E.White, Maranatha, p.200)

So those who receive God's seal, have the name of the one true God written in their foreheads. It is a settling into the truth and worshiping and living according to that truth in our minds. Now, can anyone who is NOT worshiping the one true God, get the seal of God? No, this is not possible. Which is why it is so important to find out the truth about the one true God and worship HIM, just as Revelation 14 calls us to.

Revelation 14:6-7 ...'And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people, saying with a loud voice, fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.'

The final message that goes out to the world is a call to worship the one true God. The one true God which Jesus and the apostles revealed is God the Father. NOT 'God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit'. The Bible never tells us to worship a 'trinity' or 'triune god'. The Bible tells us to worship our heavenly Father, the one true God. To HIM ALONE the world is called to worship and give their allegiance to. And if you worship God the Father, then you will also worship and follow His Son, Jesus Christ - Revelation 14:12.

But some Christians seem to think that this is a literal mark, just like they think that the mark of the beast is a literal mark, because the word "MARK" in Revelation means 'a mark'. Well, in Revelation 17 John also sees a woman riding a beast and on her forehead was the name 'Mystery Babylon the Great'. Now I'm sure no one doubts that this isn't an actual prostitute woman riding around the earth on a literal beast, with that name tattooed on her forehead! Also, in Revelation 13, we find two beasts causing the earth to worship them. Now the meaning of those words "beasts" are literal beasts. So are we to believe that there will be literal beasts roaming the earth causing the people of the world to worship them? No, I don't think so. Revelation is full of prophetic symbols and this woman and these beasts are just some of them. The name on her forehead is also symbolic, the same as the name of God on the servants foreheads. So we are dealing with a 'spiritual' seal or mark.

Those who are sealed have the FATHER's name in their forehead. Not the false name of'God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit'. Only those who understand THE TRUE GODHEAD, will receive the seal of the ONE true God, the Father ... AND who follow His Son, Jesus Christ wheresoever He goeth.

To Ed Sutton:

"On their foreheads was written, "God, New Jerusalem"

As the sealed of God"

On the above quotes from Sister White, which God is she referring to, according to you:  The only true God that is in the Law of God, or the Trinity God?

Thank you

Sonia

To Vigilantius:  Please find below an extract from a website: The Prophet Still Speaks, of Terry Hill, a Seventh-Day Adventist Non-trinitarian.  If you go to his website you will find a great deal of useful information:   http://theprophetstillspeaks.co.uk/Index.htm      http://theprophetstillspeaks.co.uk/MM.htm

"The trinity doctrine and the Seventh-day Adventist Church

These trinity papers are dedicated to helping all those who are interested to understand the issues regarding the present trinity debate within the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

 PREFACE  This study has been prompted by the ongoing Godhead debate within Seventh-day Adventism or as it can rightly be called the Seventh-day Adventist trinity controversy. The author of this study - a lay person of 68 years of age and a Seventh-day Adventist for over 36 years - has been involved in this debate for more than 10 years. Consequently, during this time period, he has written a great deal regarding the various aspects of it, much of which can be found here http://theprophetstillspeaks.co.uk The underlying problem It is more than likely that concerning our Godhead controversy, some Seventh-day Adventists, even though the discussions have been going on around them for many years, are still unaware of the underlying problem. This is rather unfortunate because until this problem is understood, the controversy itself will not be understood. During my studies I can truthfully say that I have not come across anyone who has summed up this problem better than Jerry Moon. In a few brief statements he captured the picture perfectly. In a book published by our denomination which is said to have been written to answer the many questions raised in this debate, although I do believe, having read it through many times, it does fall short of achieving this objective he explained (this was on the very first page of the chapter dealing with the trinity doctrine and anti-trinitarianism in Seventh-day Adventist history) That most of the leading SDA pioneers were non-Trinitarian in their theology has become accepted Adventist history, surprising as it sounded to most Adventists 40 years ago when Erwin R. Gane wrote an M. A. thesis on the topic. (Jerry Moon, The Trinity, chapter, Trinity and anti-trinitarianism in Seventh-day Adventist history, page 190) Amongst other positions he holds, Jerry Moon, PhD, is presently Associate Professor of Church History at Andrews University. Needless to say, he is an avid supporter of the version of the trinity doctrine currently held by our denomination. Here he is saying that it is now common knowledge (accepted Adventist history) that the majority of the leading SDA pioneers were non-trinitarian. Moon was not the sole author of the book 'The Trinity'. He coauthored it along with Woodrow Whidden and John Reeve. The reality of our history is that it was not just most of our early leading pioneers who were non-trinitarian but all of them. In fact it is true to say that our entire denomination as a denomination (the preponderant and the official view) - was once non-trinitarian. This was not only for a brief period of time but for the duration of Ellen Whites ministry (1844-1915). It even remained the same for decades after her death. This was not simply because as a denomination we rejected the idea of the 'one God' being a trinity of divine persons (as described by the trinity doctrine) but because our beliefs concerning God the Father, Christ and the Holy Spirit would not have fitted into a trinitarian concept of God. This meant that before the trinity doctrine could be officially accepted by our denomination (it was first voted in as part of our fundamental beliefs at a General Conference session in 1980), the thinking of Seventh-day Adventists world-wide needed to be changed - at least concerning the 3 personalities of the Godhead. Obvious to relate, this did not happen overnight. It took many years to accomplish. Whilst it is true to say that even in our 'earlier days' the word 'trinity' was used in our publications to describe the three personalities of the Godhead - even being used in our 1931 statement of beliefs it was not used in the sense of trinitarianism as in the trinity doctrine. It was not until 1980 that a declaration of God being a trinity, as described by the trinity doctrine, was accepted into our fundamental beliefs. Even then, amongst the delegates at the General Conference session where the wording of this belief (now No. 2 of our fundamental beliefs) was formulated, there were differences of opinion as to how this belief should be phrased. Before being finalised, the actual wording underwent a considerable amount of discussion and change. This will be seen in chapter 28. All of this came about because after Ellen White died (1915), some of our then leading brethren began to promote trinitarian concepts of the Godhead. This was particularly concerning Christ and the Holy Spirit. These concepts though did not become the norm in our church for decades after Ellen White's death. It was the continual promotion of these beliefs, also the acceptance of them by both ministry and laity in general, that led to the eventual acceptance of the trinity doctrine. Jerry Moon continues More recently, a further question has arisen with increasing urgency: was the pioneers belief about the Godhead right or wrong? (Ibid) Along with the rest of our leadership, Jerry Moon is well aware that concerning the three personalities of the Godhead (the Father, Son and Holy Spirit), the official beliefs we hold today are far different than those generally held by Seventh-day Adventists between 1844 and the late 1940's/1950s. He also realises that our current beliefs are not a modification of what we once taught but a replacement for it. In other words he fully realises that the old beliefs (those generally held by Seventh-day Adventists during Ellen Whites ministry also for decades beyond) have been discarded and the new beliefs (our present beliefs) have taken their place which in itself is a denial that the discarded beliefs are the truth. This is because truth never changes. If our ditched Godhead beliefs had been true (when we held them), they would still be true today. Further revelation from God does not invalidate truth. It only makes it that much clearer. This means that according to our current church leadership, the non-trinitarian beliefs as generally held by us for the first 100 years or so of our existence (1844 -1950's) - are false doctrine (heresy). This is the reasoning that today's Seventh-day Adventists are being urged to accept (by our leadership) which quite understandably, some are finding difficulty to do. This is because it would mean for the first 100 years of our existence as God's remnant people, we were teaching the world - concerning God, Christ and the Holy Spirit - very serious error, which as I am sure you will agree, is very difficult to believe. This is especially when it is realised that for the first 70 years of this time period we had Gods messenger amongst us, namely Ellen White, who, as we shall see later, supported these beliefs. This is why today there is controversy amongst us. Church members are understandably asking, as Jerry Moon put it, were our past (non-trinitarian) beliefs right or wrong? This is obviously a very important question and one that needs very serious consideration. As Moon followed on by saying (and this really is the key issue) As one line of reasoning goes, either the pioneers were wrong and the present church is right, or the pioneers were right and the present Seventh-day Adventist Church has apostatized from biblical truth.(Ibid) 4 This really does sum it up. Both sets of beliefs, meaning the old beliefs (discarded by our denomination) and the new beliefs (our current published Godhead beliefs), cannot be correct. This is because they are diametrically opposed to each other. One set of beliefs is non-trinitarian whilst the other is trinitarian. Certainly the new theology is not a modification of the old. The differences can never be harmonised. They depict two entirely different concepts. It can only be concluded therefore that if our current published Godhead beliefs are biblical, then our early non-trinitarian beliefs are not biblical. Alternatively, if our once non-trinitarian beliefs were biblical, then it can only be concluded, as Jerry Moon freely admits, the present Seventh-day Adventist Church has apostatized from biblical truth. In our present Godhead controversy, this is the underlying problem (the bottom line of the argument) and Jerry Moon recognises the seriousness of it. So too should every Seventhday Adventist. This is why each one of us, as members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, should regard this Godhead debate as being very important. We need to understand who in this controversy is right and who is wrong. This is the prime purpose of this study. It is to help those who are interested, which in the main will probably be Seventhday Adventists (and those of like thinking), to understand the key issues involved. This will help in drawing the correct conclusions. The way God works Some may say that God would not allow error (false doctrine) to come into the Seventh-day Adventist Church but this is not in keeping with the way He works. As Ellen White explained (remembering we are seriously infected by Laodicean lukewarmness Revelation 3:14-22) God will arouse His people; if other means fail, heresies will come in among them, which will sift them, separating the chaff from the wheat. The Lord calls upon all who believe His word to awake out of sleep. Precious light has come, appropriate for this time. It is Bible truth, showing the perils that are right upon us. This light should lead us to a diligent study of the Scriptures and a most critical examination of the positions which we hold. God would have all the bearings and positions of truth thoroughly and perseveringly searched, with prayer and fasting. (Ellen G. White, Testimonies Volume 5, page 707, The mysteries of the Bible a proof of its inspiration) It is the bringing in of heresies into the beliefs of Seventh-day adventists that will serve as a wake-up call for God's people. God will use these false teachings to sift the chaff from the wheat. If we have failed to make a critical examination of our beliefs, God will not stop us from believing error. This is because He has given each of us the responsibility of studying for ourselves (1 Thessalonians 5:19-21). We cannot offload that responsibility onto someone else. Previous to the above, Ellen White warned of the 'danger' in our church of the lack of difference of opinion. She explained The fact that there is no controversy or agitation among God's people should not be regarded as conclusive evidence that they are holding fast to sound doctrine. There is reason to fear that they may not be clearly discriminating between truth and error. When no new questions are started by investigation of the Scriptures, when no difference of opinion arises which will set men to searching the Bible for themselves to make sure that they have the truth, there will be many now, as in ancient times, who will hold to tradition and worship they know not what. (Ibid) 5 You and I cannot afford to be found in that latter group meaning amongst those who hold to tradition and worship they know not what. Our salvation is at stake. The words that Ellen White wrote next are probably very applicable to us today I have been shown that many who profess to have a knowledge of present truth know not what they believe. They do not understand the evidences of their faith. They have no just appreciation of the work for the present time. When the time of trial shall come, there are men now preaching to others who will find, upon examining the positions they hold, that there are many things for which they can give no satisfactory reason. Until thus tested they knew not their great ignorance. And there are many in the church who take it for granted that they understand what they believe; but, until controversy arises, they do not know their own weakness. When separated from those of like faith and compelled to stand singly and alone to explain their belief, they will be surprised to see how confused are their ideas of what they had accepted as truth. Certain it is that there has been among us a departure from the living God and a turning to men, putting human in place of divine wisdom. (Ibid)